RSS

Notes On a Tutorial About Raising Dead People

11 Apr

I came across a weird little item a couple of days ago and have wondered whether I should let it go or write about it. As you can see, I’ve made my decision. The item of which I write is entitled, Raising Dead People: A Tutorial. Well, hell’s bells – who could resist reading that? Someone is going to teach others how to raise people from the dead? This, I’ve got to see.

So, I saw.

And I learned that the author of the tutorial hasn’t actually raised anyone from the dead. But she knows enough about it to teach others how to do it, or at least exhort them to go out and try it themselves. Here’s how she described her failed attempt to raise the dead:

So, we all dug deep and held some non-stop vigil prayer, asking God to raise him from the dead as a witness to His power in the community where we worked. As we announced our plans, every crazy intercessor with a shofar came out of the woodwork and we started to worship and to pray–mostly all the scriptures where people were raised from the dead.

We tried to raise our game and also leave room for the will of God. A tricky business–expecting the miraculous and leaving room for God. We put his name down to preach at his own “life celebration” we were planning–which would have been the coolest preach ever. But after four days of non-stop prayer and a lot of shofar blowing and prayer walking the morgue seven times, our friend never got up. He was as dead as dead is.

Maybe I misunderstood the title of the piece. Maybe I was mistaken to think that a piece entitled Raising Dead People: A Tutorial would actually be about successfully raising people from the dead, not about trying to do it and failing. However, since the author couldn’t report a successful attempt at dead raising, she ended up writing a tutorial about some other religious/spiritual nonsense and giving it a catchy, if slightly misleading, title (I say slightly because she did come back to the idea that people can be raised from the dead by other than medical means; besides, for this one time only, I’ll err on the side of generosity :) ). I should have known this would happen when she inserted this little bit into the paragraph that preceded the excerpt cited above:

Anyway, years ago, a bunch of our community started watching these DVDs of a guy who taught people how to raise the dead…. In our community at the time, there was a man who was diagnosed with a terminal illness. We were praying hard for his healing, but he succumbed to his disease. Because he was part of the group of people who had watched these videos and prayed that God would help us to at least try to raise our expectations of what He could do…

Did you catch the last bit? Notice how the goalposts were moved. We’re no longer talking about positively raising people from the dead. Now we’re talking about merely raising expectations that god could empower believers to raise the dead. If he chose to do so.

The author excused her failure with this caveat: The good news is that the guy who teaches the videos said that it wasn’t until he prayed for the seventh dead guy, that it worked. It took perseverance and a whole lot of humility.

Oh. man! I’ve got to hand it to the author of the videos! He scammed this lady and her friends beautifully. His schtick was basically, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. And again. And yet again. That’s the perseverance part and it can actually be measured. One can count the number of attempts one makes to do something until one either succeeds or gives up. If one never succeeds, maybe one should have tried just one more time and he or she would have hit pay dirt. But, the person quit too early, so now we’ll never know. Even more cleverly, the formula for successful dead raising doesn’t end with a quantitative measure. Oh, no. It’s accompanied by something that can’t be measured, but can always be dredged up as the real reason for continued failure – lack of humility. Presumably, one may fail to raise the dead once, twice, seven times, seventy times seven times, whatever, and never succeed and believers will never know if the problem is that he or she hasn’t made a sufficient number of attempts, or that the person just isn’t humble enough to succeed. It’s a given that believers won’t consider the possibility probability that prayer and religious rituals will never work because no gods are paying attention to them.

I wish I could watch the DVDs myself and see this con artist in action, but I can’t. The author of the tutorial didn’t provide any information about them. No link to a website. No DVD titles. Not even a name for this miracle working “guy who taught people how to raise the dead.” So, if you want to check her sources, you’ll have to do some digging on your own. If you find them, let me know. While you search, I’ll be walking the dogs (or washing my hair or something. Honestly, if I had seen videos like these, I sure as hell would have noted the titles, or at least the name of the guy! That’s more than a minor oversight, if you ask me.).

If you’re interested in reading the rest of what the tutorial author wrote, go right to her piece. She wrote some more interesting stuff, including an admission that she’s crazy for trying to raise dead people. What you won’t find is a surefire recipe for raising dead people to life. She doesn’t have it. My guess is, she never will.

– the chaplain

About these ads
 

10 responses to “Notes On a Tutorial About Raising Dead People

  1. PhillyChief

    April 11, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    I think I should contact the publisher with my book ideas. First book: How to Achieve World Peace. Second Book: How to Always Understand Women. Third book: How to Win the Lottery.

    I haven’t actually done any of those things but hey, that apparently isn’t a requirement for writing such books.

     
  2. The Vicar (via Wordpress)

    April 11, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    When I saw the words “Raising Dead People”, I didn’t think “zombie making”, I thought “corpses in diapers”. The tragic thing is, no matter how good a job you do, they will never perform well on their SATs.

     
  3. the chaplain

    April 11, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    Philly:
    How many get-rich-quick authors actually succeeded in getting rich before they started selling their books? Maybe you’re right – actual experience, success, shit like that, are way over-rated.

    Vicar:
    I guess zombies would do poorly on SATs because their brains have been sucked right out of their heads (or something like that, I’m not really up on zombie lore). Corpses in diapers may also do poorly on SATS, but as least they’ll smell good (assuming their diapers are changed when necessary).

     
  4. The Vicar (via Wordpress)

    April 11, 2012 at 7:17 pm

    Zombies are UNdead; if you’re going to interpret “raising the dead” along the lines of “raising children” then they can’t be zombies. And not only does the SAT grade a lack of response as being wrong, but I don’t think that corpses aged to around 16 years would smell good even if you had them in diapers.

    (On the plus side, you wouldn’t have to worry about them developing a drug habit or joining a gang, and there would be absolutely no need to worry about whether they needed to be medicated for hyperactivity. The PTA meetings would be unfortunate but interesting.)

    Come to think of it, “raising the dead” could also be interpreted along the lines of “raising tomatoes”. You know, plant a seed (try not to think too hard about what kind) in your back yard, give it water and fertilizer and lots of sunshine, and you get a fine crop of corpses in the mid-to-late summer. Use as many as you can, give some away to friends and neighbors, and then pickle or can the rest so you can have them available all winter long. (Do you use sugar when you pickle them, or just brine?) Unlike most crops, though, you can’t compost the leftovers because doing so will make your compost pile attract rats.

     
  5. MrPopularSentiment

    April 11, 2012 at 8:25 pm

    WAIT WAIT WAIT a second… so first, the guy is sick and they pray for his healing, but that fails. So then they pray for him to be raised from the dead, and that fails too. This is a terrible batting average!

     
    • the chaplain

      April 13, 2012 at 8:36 am

      Thanks for pointing out that they’ve already had two failed attempts – one at healing and one at resurrection.

       
  6. desertscope

    April 12, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    It must be terrible to be a soulless nonbeliever. I, for one, have perfect faith in the ability to raise the dead. It’s documented right there in The Good Book™. I must admit, though, I am a bit discouraged by our progress with Uncle Phil. It’s been about nine days and we’re getting signs that he wasn’t quite an incorruptible, if you know what I mean…

     
    • the chaplain

      April 13, 2012 at 8:37 am

      Gee, des – I’m sorry about your Uncle Phil. Nine days is a long time, but maybe not long enough. Perhaps you should just keep trying for another day. Or two. Or…

       
    • PhillyChief

      April 14, 2012 at 9:02 am

      What I wondered about the Lazarus story was what kind of condition he was in when allegedly raised. I think if I was raised after a week or so of rotting in the desert heat, I might wish I were still dead.

       
      • the chaplain

        April 16, 2012 at 9:17 am

        According to John 11, Lazarus was in the tomb for 4 days. How long he may have been laid out, prepared, etc., before that, I don’t know. At any rate, had a guy been dead for a minimum of 4 days, it seems that he would have looked and smelled pretty bad. Strangely enough, the author of the story described in the OP prayed over a corpse for 4 days. If she’s not completely making up shit, I don’t want to think too much about what he started smelling and looking like. After all, they hadn’t prepared him for burial or viewing or anything like that; they allegedly weren’t expecting to do any of that stuff. Just think about how nasty road kill looks after just a few hours and you’ll get an idea of what I mean. Four days with a rotting corpse? If they weren’t crazy before that experience, they should have been afterwords!

         

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers

%d bloggers like this: