RSS

Shrink Wrapped Son of Man

27 Jun

Having thoroughly enjoyed Robert M. Price’s response to Rick Warren, The Reason Driven Life, several years ago, I eagerly looked forward to reading his more recent book, The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man. Price’s aim in the latter book was to set aside theological interpretations of Christian scriptures and see if there are any passages, particularly in the four gospels, that provide hard, historical data about Jesus Christ. His conclusion, not surprisingly, is that there is no such data to be found anywhere in the Bible.

Did Jesus rise from the dead? The Gospels give us no reason to think so. Every single story bears the marks of fiction, with earlier versions ruling out later ones, with extrabiblical parallels providing abundant nonhistorical analogies, while current experience provides no historical parallel. The Gospels certainly do not put us in touch with the faith (whatever it may have been) of the earliest Christians. They do not tell us whether the resurrection of Jesus was even part of the first Christian faith(s). Everywhere we have looked, we have found naught but legend and myth, fiction and redaction. What we have found is a kind of empty tomb. What we can never tell is whether anyone was ever buried there.

Throughout his examination of numerous passages from the four gospels, the book of Acts and purportedly historical excerpts from the Pauline epistles, Price explains carefully – and, more importantly, applies – his analytical methods. Readers unfamiliar with scholarly methods of New Testament analysis will find Price’s book a good introduction to this subject.

Non-Christians who have spent any time studying Christianity are aware that many of the New Testament stories and teachings have numerous parallels in the legends and literature of other religions. Some of these religions pre-dated Judaism and Christianity and others were contemporaneous with the early Christian era. One thing I didn’t realize was how many of the New Testament stories were actually based on Old Testament legends. I was aware of some stories that are said to have “pre-figured” Jesus’ ministry, but not of others in which Old Testament healings, etc., appear to have been simply re-written with reinvented/renamed characters, much as formula fiction is written today. Throughout the book, Price carefully dissects numerous passages from the Old Testament and other ancient writings alongside their New Testament parallels and demonstrates that many biblical themes – betrayal, atonement, salvation, redemption, resurrection, etc. – are universal. Neither the themes nor their resolutions are unique to Christianity. Price shows that, far from being unique, all of the Christian Jesus-legends are either derived from or based on the literary forms of pre-existing stories of gods and heroes.

One of the things that most fascinated me was Price’s re-interpretation of the Jesus stories as competing, rather than complementary or cumulative, accounts. Price reminds the reader that the early Church was not monolithic. Dozens of Christian factions and communities believed divergent, often contradictory, bodies of “Christian” dogma and myths. When one keeps this in mind and reads the New Testament as literature produced by pro-James, or pro-Peter, or pro-John, or pro-Paul factions, the need to harmonize obviously discordant accounts disappears. Price demonstrates, to put it bluntly, that it makes more sense to read the New Testament as political propaganda produced by competing candidates/parties for church leadership than as a coherent body of god-inspired dogma.

If one accepts Price’s analyses and conclusions, one cannot accept the miracle-working, crucified-resurrected-and-ascended Bible-Jesus as an historic figure. Price leaves open the question of whether the Bible-Jesus character was loosely based on an actual itinerant preacher or a completely fabricated legend. At this point, we’ll probably never know which is the case. What we do know is, thanks to Price and many other scholars, the legend of Jesus Christ is no longer God-sized. It’s time to bring out the shrink wrap.

– the chaplain

Advertisement
 
12 Comments

Posted by on June 27, 2011 in literature, rationalism, religion

 

12 Responses to Shrink Wrapped Son of Man

  1. JohnEvo

    June 27, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    It really IS 2011, right? It’s just painful that these arguments need be made to literate people.

     
  2. Spanish Inquisitor

    June 27, 2011 at 5:45 pm

    Now I need to pull that book out and read it.

    Price leaves open the question of whether the Bible-Jesus character was loosely based on an actual itinerant preacher or a completely fabricated legend. At this point, we’ll probably never know which is the case.

    And it really doesn’t matter. If it’s loosely based on an actual preacher, or completely fabricated, it’s still fiction. It’s still a story, completely made up by the minds of men.

    As Evo points out, aren’t we as civilized, intellectualized and educated 21st centenarians just a bit beyond all that?

     
  3. tommykey

    June 27, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    it makes more sense to read the New Testament as political propaganda produced by competing candidates/parties for church leadership than as a coherent body of god-inspired dogma.

    Or at the very least, the different gospels and epistles in the NT were catered to specific, local audiences. For example, Matthew is a copy of Mark but with some more fantastical stuff added, and the way the Jews are portrayed makes me think it was aimed at a Gentile audience.

     
  4. desertscope

    June 27, 2011 at 8:17 pm

    I’m about halfway through this one. I put my reading on hiatus while I do summer school, though. I really like this book, but I find I myself having to refer to The Babble to understand some points Price makes. On the plus side, I am now completely certain that I am far more knowledgeable about The Babble than Christian friends and family.

     
  5. Paul Sunstone

    June 27, 2011 at 10:06 pm

    I agree we’ll never really know much of anything about the historical what’s-his-face who may or may not have been the kernel for the legends and myths of Jesus. All the more reason not to make a god of the poor man.

    This is off topic, but, Chappy, have you ever come across Elaine Pagel’s notion that the Gospel of John was largely written as an attack on the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas? If so, what do you think of the idea? I have yet to read her book on the subject, but I’m considering getting my hands on a copy. I’d appreciate anything you’d say on it.

     
    • Robert M. Price

      June 28, 2011 at 5:35 pm

      You might want to read Gregory J. Riley’s book Resurrection Reconsidered, which was the original statement of this case. Pagels mentions his name in her bibliography, I think, but does not really give him proper credit.

       
      • The chaplain

        June 28, 2011 at 6:26 pm

        Thanks for the book recommendation, and the clarification of the scholarly lineage behind the idea for which Pagel has gotten credit.

         
      • Paul Sunstone

        June 29, 2011 at 7:01 am

        Thank you! That’s invaluable to me.

         
  6. The Blog Fodder

    June 28, 2011 at 4:56 am

    Added to my to-read list. I have read several of Bart D Erhman’s books on the NT and found them quite interesting. No wonder Christians do not want their children to go to University. They might learn to read and think. Dangerous combination.

     
  7. the chaplain

    June 28, 2011 at 11:46 am

    Evo:
    I feel your pain.

    SI:
    Check your ebooks – I’m pretty sure you’ve got this one. :)

    tommykey:
    Good point about letters written to local audiences. Many Christians today don’t realize how fragmented and localized early Christianity was. Beliefs that contemporary Christians often see as being set in stone and unchanging have actually always been very fluid. Christianity could well have turned out completely differently than it did. Contrary to current dogma, history didn’t unfold in accordance with a deity’s pre-ordained plan.

    des:
    It definitely helps to keep a Babble handy while reading Price’s book, even though he does quote scripture passages rather extensively.

    Paul:
    I’ve never read any of Pagel’s books, so I’m not familiar with her theories. It’s interesting that you mentioned the Gospel of Thomas – Price draws on that a lot in his analyses.

    Blog Fodder:
    I’ve enjoyed several of Ehrman’s books too. As for Christian kids and universities, evangelicals have been establishing Bible colleges and Christian liberal arts institutions for well over a century. That allows them to develop their children’s minds enough for the next generation to function professionally, yet keep tight control over the content that goes into those minds.

     
  8. Ahab

    June 28, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    It’s refreshing to see these ideas coming from mainstream books. Jesus, like any legendary figure, may have been an actual person around who embellished fantasies have been constructed, or he may not have lived at all. I think we can appreciate the legends of Jesus without accepting them as literal accounts of history, as fundamentalists do.

     
    • JohnEvo

      June 28, 2011 at 11:26 pm

      Ahab – I don’t know… do you think the New Testament is particularly good fiction, or that it has any original wisdom? I don’t really “appreciate the legends” and I can see why the more fundamental believers get so strident about the literal truth. If it’s not true, then there is no major religious philosophy. It all hinges on Original Sin (bullshit) Christ dying on the cross for humanity (OK… possibly in the mind of the man on the cross, if he existed), rising from the dead (bullshit) and awarding salvation to anyone, for anything, as long as they just accept the story as Truth (bullshit). Just to say that Jesus said a few things that were pretty wise for 2,000 years ago, doesn’t make a very compelling case for devoting your life to being a Christian.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 60 other followers