RSS

Monthly Archives: January 2010

The Last Supper

Inspired by the second video clip in Mark’s recent post, I decided to share some Last Supper parodies with you. There dozens of these on the Internet. Dan Savage has a page of these that he’s updated several times. I don’t intend to do that (with one exception noted at the end of the post); just google “last supper parodies” if you want to see more of these.

We’ll begin with the one that I captured from Mark’s blog, Mel Brooks Last Supper:


Next up is the Fast Food Mascots Last Supper:


The next one should warm the hearts (or pierce the feet) of all parents whose children love(d) Lego blocks:


This one should bring back memories for readers of The Spanish Inquisitor’s blog:


Next, we have the armchair philosopher’s favorite TV cartoon philosopher:


I’ll close with two science fiction parodies. The first is the science fiction series that sparked my initial interest in the genre:


Finally, my favorite recent science fiction series, Battlestar Galactica:


I was surprised that I couldn’t find a Star Trek Last Supper parody. That’s a project one of you graphic gurus can undertake. This assignment, should you decide to accept it, will be the only update of this post.

– the chaplain

 
23 Comments

Posted by on January 31, 2010 in humor

 

View From My Window

Saturday, January 30, 2010 – 3:17 p.m. EST:

– the chaplain

 
24 Comments

Posted by on January 30, 2010 in photography

 

Think About This


I came across this interesting quote from William Booth, founder and first general of The Salvation Army, this morning. I suspect that a standard apologetic for this quote is the idea that The Salvation Army intentionally ministers to those who are society’s outcasts and losers, the gravely impoverished, those with whom “decent” people hesitate to associate. Still, I couldn’t help wondering if this thought also reflects an impoverished view of humankind. After all, this is a religious organization that holds the following creed:

We believe that our first parents were created in a state of innocency, but by their disobedience they lost their purity and happiness, and that in consequence of their fall all men have become sinners, totally depraved, and as such are justly exposed to the wrath of God. (The Salvation Army, doctrine #5).

Now, I’m not a glassy-eyed idealist who believes that humankind is inherently inclined toward goodness. Nor am I a frothing-mouthed pessimist who believes that humankind is thoroughly wicked. My observations of humankind, plus readings of history, philosophy, sociology, etc., have led me to conclude that people have varied, often contradictory, personal, social and moral characteristics and dispositions. Given that, I’m thoroughly repulsed by the notion that all people are “totally depraved,” especially as a consequence of what two people may have done thousands or millions of years ago (a notion that is contingent, of course, on whether those people even existed).

If you ask me, a standard Christian notion of its so-called Good News (people suck, but god can fix them) isn’t encouraging. I’ll stick to my humanist view of humankind as a species that is imperfect, but has the potential to continue improving our moral and social lot. We also have the potential to blow ourselves to smithereens, but I’ll note that the Christian view doesn’t preclude that possibility; it just leaves humanity’s fate in the hands of its god. Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll take responsibility for my own fate; I trust my flawed hands more than I trust his invisible ones.

– the chaplain

 
28 Comments

Posted by on January 29, 2010 in humanism, religion

 

Belief and Marriage

A factor that many couples consider before getting married is religious compatibility. Couples who share similar religious beliefs often feel that those beliefs are among the most important bonds that will tie them together through life’s myriad challenges. It’s probably safe to say that many couples to whom religion is important never imagine that their beliefs will alter to such an extent that their marriages may be threatened. If anything, they imagine that their faith will continue to grow upward and outward, stronger and deeper, individually and communally, throughout their lives. Any other possibilities – one partner converts from Christianity to Judaism, or from Islam to Christianity, or from Hinduism to Buddhism, or from some religion to no religion – are unfathomable.

What got me thinking about this topic is a passage from the penultimate chapter of Leaving Islam. It was written by an apostate American Muslim woman who, as far as she knows, is married to a true believer:

A few weeks ago, my husband told me a story about a man who lived to a very old age and died twenty years ago. All his life this man preached Islam and was even the one who called the Adhan (Muslim call to prayer) in his little town every day until his final illness. On his deathbed, he asked for his family – he had had several sons and daughters who in turn had families of their own. After his family came to him, he asked for a copy of the Koran. He had tears in his eyes, so his family thought that he was going to recite a part of the Koran for one last time, as they had seen him do so many times in the past. But when they put it in his hands, he said, “I hereby renounce everything written in this book. It is a lie.” And then the man died.

I was speechless when I heard this. I could see myself in this man, hopelessly “trapped” in the role carved out for him, afraid to tell others that he had found out the truth. I also wondered when this happened, exactly. Did he find out at the end of his life? Or did he go through decades of torturous pretense?

- snip -

I am in the process of assessing my relationship with my husband. I know that I cannot tell him without divorcing him, and I need to consider not only myself by my children as well. My husband is not a malicious person, but who knows what he might do if he is provoked by the realization that I have apostated and do not wish to go back to Islam? I might gather up enough courage to run and build a life where I should not hide my belief. Or it may well be that I, too, will be like that old man, brave enough to tell the truth only on my deathbed.

Coming out to one’s spouse as an apostate can be terrifying. The woman I quoted above may have good reasons for believing that her husband will divorce her if he learns her secret. Then again, if she can find the courage and means to come out to him, she may discover, as I did, that his thinking is much closer to her own than she realizes. I can’t help wondering why he told her the story. Was he feeling out her response in order to gauge how he should frame his own? Still, I understand her fear because I once felt it. So did the deacon. Some couples, like the deacon and me, discover that their beliefs have evolved on similar, parallel tracks. Other couples find that the beliefs they once shared are no longer common grounds for bonding. Some couples who unexpectedly find themselves on opposite different sides of the religious divide cannot salvage their marriages. Sadly, their religious differences create (or, sometimes perhaps, exacerbate) relational chasms that cannot be bridged. Other couples find ways to retain their connections, but doing so requires intense effort on the part of both partners. All marriages require intense commitments, obviously, but significant religious differences create tensions that many couples never anticipate confronting. Such differences force couples to think long and hard about what the phrase, “for better, or for worse” really means. They also force couples to assess their marriages in their entirety and discover exactly what bonds they share that keep them together despite holding strikingly different worldviews.

Religion doesn’t poison marriage any more than it poisons anything else. For religious people whose beliefs grow in similar ways over their lives, religion provides a strong bond. I know scores of people for whom this is true. For once-religious people whose views shift dramatically or reverse over time, those shifts and reversals can be a source of bonding and reflection – once they are openly acknowledged. The situation in which religion can poison a marriage is when partners’ views diverge, when one partner loses religion completely or converts to a different religion. Do philosophical differences between marriage partners have the same effects on their relationships? Would a Platonic idealist be able to marry, or remain married to, an Aristotelian empiricist? I honestly don’t know. Would a Marxist be unable to marry, or remain married to, a capitalist? In this case, it’s conceivable to me that the answer easily could be no. The problem I’ve been discussing throughout this post is ideology, not religion, per se. It just happens that religion is a prominent example of ideology that affects (infects?) many people deeply, so it’s one we commonly see at play.

The conclusion I draw from these thoughts is that people should be careful not to become so married to beliefs of any kind that their marriages to flesh-and-blood companions become secondary. At dinnertime, on long walks in the park or along the beach, and on winter nights, the deacon will always be much more satisfying company than The God Delusion.

– the chaplain

 
20 Comments

Posted by on January 16, 2010 in coming out, deconversion, rationalism, religion

 

The Gift of Doubt

If you’ve looked at my sidebar recently, you may have noticed that I’ve been reading Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out. One of the book’s most compelling chapters was written by Ali Sina, founder of the Faith Freedom International website. This passage really caught my attention:

Doubt is the greatest gift we can give each other. It is the gift of enlightenment. Doubt will set us free, advance knowledge, and unravel the mysteries of the universe, but faith will keep us ignorant.

Doubt is what pushes us to ask questions and seek answers to them. But, we have to be careful to suss out the right answers, not just those answers that make us feel good, or are easy to find, or are popular. Faith enables us to settle for answers that merely appear to meet our needs, regardless of whether they are the right answers or are useful for any purposes other than making us feel good or helping us fit in with the crowd.

Doubt is where learning begins; faith is where it ends.

– the chaplain

 
39 Comments

Posted by on January 13, 2010 in rationalism

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 77 other followers