Jimmy and the Dinosaur

2008 August 4
by the chaplain

When I was in third grade, I fell madly in love with Jimmy Munson. He was cute, athletic, funny and popular. What else would an eight year old girl require in a soul mate? I was not even repulsed by the fact that Jimmy loved dinosaurs. (Wayne, on the other hand, loved snakes, which was just weird. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Wayne grew up to be an ax murderer or something.) I hadn’t thought of either of those boys in years, perhaps even decades. That state of affairs changed when I read the dinosaur chapter in Italo Calvino’s entertaining little book, Cosmicomics. This book is a fiction work about science, but it is not science fiction. Instead, Cosmicomics is an insider’s look at some of the great mysteries of science, as revealed by a character named Qwfwq (take my advice, spare yourself the bother of learning a foreign language and just pronounce it K-Fuck).

In the dinosaur chapter, Qwfwq describes how it feels to be the last dinosaur. He is surrounded by a new species of creatures that never knew the dinosaurs. Instead, they have received, and continue to transmit, distorted myths about the sorts of creatures the fearsome, grotesque dinosaurs must have been. Qfwfq lives among these New Ones, yet never reveals his identity. He sort of fits into an evolving world, yet is always slightly aloof from it. He has a love affair, yet cannot sustain long-term intimacy and companionship. Qwfwq is not alone, yet he suffers from nearly unbearable loneliness. In the end, however, Qwfwq finds solace in two things. First, he recognizes that the evolving dinosaur legends, which raise the creatures to mythic, even heroic, status, will long outlive and overshadow the realities of what their mundane lives actually had been. Second, upon meeting a young creature whom he recognizes as his own son, Qwfwq realizes that he has been the bridge between two species. He is the lone surviving relic of an extinct group. His son, who bears the unmistakable imprimatur of his dinosaur heritage, identifies completely with the New Ones. Qwfwq realizes that this is as it should be. And, perhaps, he also realizes that the dinosaurs will never die completely. They will be transformed, certainly, but their heirs will continue to dominate the world, just as their forebears did. As the tale ends and Qwfwq loses himself in a crowd, the reader senses that Qwfwq has finally become comfortable being exactly who he is. He may be alone again, but he’s not lonely anymore.

I lost track of Jimmy (and Wayne) after the seventh grade. I imagine they have been busy raising their families, just as I have been (Wayne probably is not an ax murderer; he was a pretty nice kid, except for the snake thing). I wonder if they’ve passed on their childhood passions, just as I’ve passed on my passions for baseball and music to my children? I doubt that any of us will play the sort of pivotal role that Qwfwq played in the dinosaur tale. Jimmy, Wayne and I don’t belong to a species on the brink of extinction (unless we blow ourselves to smithereens or drown ourselves under rapidly melting glaciers). What we can share with Qwfwq is joy in being fully engaged in the adventure of life. We will continue living our lives and we will continue passing on our accumulated wisdom, passions and dreams to those who come after us. They, in turn, will keep the pattern going for countless generations to come. And life will continue going on and on and on….

– the chaplain

10 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 August 5

    It is interesting how the so-called “terror of being alone in the universe” often quoted by Christians as an argument for believing ceases to be effective when that state of isolation becomes normalised, in the way your posting suggested to me. We are part of the river of life and there doesn’t have to be a mythical friend on the bank watching the passing of the water.

  2. 2008 August 5

    Yes, life will go on. We will die, but what we do will last for a while. I can’t imagine living my life in a constant state of wishful thinking of an eternal life forgetting what I live for today. Live for today and nothing less.

  3. 2008 August 5
    Ordinary Girl permalink

    Chappy, it was my favorite tale in the book (too – if I can presume it was yours too). Life goes on and the best thing to teach the next generation is to think for themselves.

  4. 2008 August 5

    chappy & OG: I’m surprised that neither of you saw the story on the allegorical level. Old age vs. youth; the “pre-Mussolin” Italy vs. the “post-Mussolini” Italy. I think Qfwfq is resigned to being superannuated, but I don’t think he ever becomes “comfortable” about who he is. At the end, he “loses” himself — in a crowd, his essence is gone although he continues to live on.

  5. 2008 August 5

    AThinkingMan – I never found the theistic Argument from Desolation persuasive. Hoping something is the case does not make it so.

    DB – I agree with you. We need to cease the moment rather than looking forward and missing what we have in the meantime.

    OG: Yes, this was my favorite chapter.

    Ex: Your pre- and post-Mussolini interpretation is interesting. I wasn’t thinking about Calvino’s context when I read the book. As for Qwfwq’s comfort level, I prefer my optimistic spin; yours is depressing.

    So, what do we do now? Go back to the original Italian text and look for clues as to Calvino’s actual intended meaning? Read the writings of Calvino’s disciples and figure out which one is probably more accurate, perhaps the one whom Calvino loved the most, or his brother or half-brother (depending on the paternity issue), or the one whom he allegedly designated as the heir to his legacy? I don’t know; that seems like an awful lot of effort to expend on interpreting a work of fiction, even though it is very enjoyable fiction.

  6. 2008 August 5

    I really liked this chapter, too – and found it fascinating to compare it to the one where Qwfwq (Cue-fuck, surely?) loses his girlfriend to his uncle.

  7. 2008 August 5

    chappy:

    We don’t need to do any investigation of Calvino’s life or philosophy. The beauty of great literature is that each reader brings to it a different personal history, a different background of reading, and, therefore, a different filter through which to interpret it. Great literature can withstand being seeing through a variety of filters.

    So we’re both right.

    As far as my spin being depressing: I don’t think so. Because we’ve both neglected to mention how funny the story — indeed every story in the book — is. Calvino’s brilliance is in making you identify with Qfwfq, whatever he may be, while simultaneously realizing how ludicrous he is. And, therefore, how laughable we, ourselves, are in our own attempts to hang on to our “dinosaur” ways.

    Shit, one of the reasons that Calvino is a great writer and I’m just a fucking blogger is that he transcends mere words. I can’t really articulate clearly what I mean. But suffice it to say that I didn’t find cosmicomics a downer at all. I thought it was airy and hilarious despite its gloomy elements.

  8. 2008 August 6

    Delightful post. Thanks for a most enjoyable break in a otherwise crappy day.

  9. 2008 August 6

    Ridger – All in all, poor Qwfwq had a wretched love life.

    Exterminator – Calvino’s book was a fun read. I wish I could read it in its original language, as I’m sure there are nuances that a translation can’t help either missing or mangling.

    Mercurious – I’m glad I brightened your crappy day a bit.

  10. 2008 August 13

    Hm, good point, Stermy. Now I’m grinning as I realise that ‘dinosaur’ is of course a term used to refer to old people generally! I hadn’t noticed that while reading.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS