Historical Revisionism For Jesus

My American readers are familiar that disgusting phenomenon known as Dominionism, a movement that has been active in the USA for several decades. Dominionists are people who want to establish a theocracy, or something close to it, in the USA. A favorite tactic of theirs is to claim that the USA is and always has been a Christian nation. It seems that Captain Army Barmy wants to follow in the footsteps of his American peers.

Canadians celebrated Canada Day on July 1. On that date in 1867, the British North America Act united Canada as an independent country composed, at that time, of four provinces. The holiday used to be known as Dominion Day, but was renamed Canada Day in 1982. Captain Army Barmy, apparently not content to celebrate Canada Day as a civic, secular holiday, posted the following blurb on his July 1 blog entry:

dominiondayBS

The relevant text reads,

Happy Dominion Day in Canada. The ‘dominion’ refers to God’s dominion. Canada is properly called the Dominion of Canada, based on Psalm 72:8:

“He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth.”

What a truckload of bullshit. Canada Day, even during its tenure as Dominion Day, never had anything to do with God’s dominion over the earth. Oh, I forgot – it’s okay to rewrite history for Jesus. Captain Army Barmy is simply following in the footsteps of Christians who have been doing it for 2,000 years.

– the chaplain

Travel Notes #2

The deacon and I have been without Internet access since Sunday morning. We spent most of this week in upstate New York, hanging around Lake George. In addition to touring historic forts (Ticonderoga and William Henry), we took a dinner cruise on the lake’s south basin. These are some of the things we saw:

lgny003-062909web

lgny014-062909web

lgny016-062909web

lgny015-062909web

lgny020b-062909web

lgny027-062909web

lgny029-062909web

lgny030-062909web

I’ll be visiting all of your blogs in a few days, when I get a decent Internet connection. Right now, I’m subject to the whims of KOA’s wi-fi gods, who – judging by their lack of alacrity in operating the Intertubes – appear to have gotten a head start on their Independence Day festivities.

– the chaplain

Travel Notes #1

The Deacon and I are taking a week of vacation. This is a good thing, because my job has been crazy lately – crazy events, crazy hours…. Yes, I know dealing with the craziness enables me to pay the bills (and the occasional vacation), but I’m still glad to get away from it for a few days.

We spent most of yesterday at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs. When I was a kid, Pocono Downs was just a local harness racing track. Since I moved away, they’ve added a casino to the place. Neither the casino nor the race track charges admission. They don’t need to do so, since all they have to do is open the doors, let people in, and watch their bank account grow.

We began by gambling a bit – the only games they have are slot machines. After eating lunch, we spent the afternoon at the race track, where we gambled some more. After the races, we ate supper, then closed out the day by gambling some more. All in all, we did okay – we lost less than $20.00 for the day. Considering that it costs more than that for two people to go to a movie, and more than that for one person to go to an amusement park, a day at the casino/track was relatively inexpensive entertainment.

Here are some photos from the races.

All in all, it was a fun day. Next stop, upstate New York.

– the chaplain

Atheist Inspiration #3: David Hume

portableatheistChristopher Hitchens’ Portable Atheist contains a delightful little essay by James Boswell, entitled, An Account of My Last Interview with David Hume, Esq. I’ll open this inspirational thought with some excerpts from Boswell’s essay:

On Sunday forenoon the 7 of July 1776, being too late for church, I went to see Mr. David Hume, who was returned from London and Bath, just a-dying. I found him alone, in a reclining posture in his drawing room. He was lean, ghastly, and quite of an earthly appearance…. He was quite different from the plump figure which he used to present. He seemed to be placid and even cheerful. He said he was just approaching his end…. He said he never had entertained any belief in religion since he began to read Locke and Clarke…. He then said flatly that the morality of every religion was bad, and, I really thought, was not jocular when he said that when he heard a man was religious, he concluded he was a rascal, though he had known some instances of very good men being religious. This was just an extravagant reverse of the common remark as to infidels.

I had a strong curiosity to be satisfied if he persisted in disbelieving a future state even when he had death before his eyes. I was persuaded from what he now said, and from his manner of saying it, that he did persist. I asked him if it was not possible that there might be a future state. He answered it was possible that a piece of coal put upon the fire would not burn; and he added that it was a most unreasonable fancy that we should exist forever….

I asked him if the thought of annihilation never gave him any uneasiness. He said not the least; no more than the thought that he had not been, as Lucretius observes. “Well,” said I, “Mr. Hume, I hope to triumph over you when I meet you in a future state; and remember you are not to pretend that you was joking with all this infidelity.” “No, no,” said he. “But I shall have been so long there before you come that it will be nothing new.” In this style of good humour and levity did I conduct the conversation….

He had once said to me, on a forenoon while the sun was shining bright, that he did not wish to be immortal. This was a most wonderful thought. The reason he gave was that he was very well in this state of being, and that the chances were very much against his being so well in another state; and that he would rather not be more than be worse….

… the truth is that Mr. Hume’s pleasantry was such that there was no solemnity in the scene; and death for the time did not seem dismal. It surprised me to find him talking of different matters with a tranquility of mind and a clearness of head, which few men possess at any time…. He said he had no pain but was wasting away.

It was amazing to me to find him so keen in such a state…. He said, “If there were a future state, Mr. Boswell, I think I could give as good an account of my life as most people.”

What a fabulous account of David Hume’s attitude when he knew death was near. Hume was an infidel. He had no hope of eternal life, nor did he have a desire for such a life. He also had little or no fear of death and certainly no fear of hell. He faced death squarely and he looked back over his life with a sense of having lived well.

I can’t help contrasting Hume’s outlook with the apparent attitudes of the two Christian ladies I wrote about in a previous post. To be fair, I will note that these ladies are ordinary people who probably haven’t thought much about what they believe and why they believe it. David Hume, on the other hand, was one of the greatest thinkers in history. He certainly thought long, hard and deeply about his beliefs. Unlike some (many?) religious believers who hope and pray that they will hear Jesus say, “Well done, good and faithful servant,” (Matthew 25:21) rather than, “I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!” (Matthew 7:23), Hume had no fear of eternal rejection and damnation. He did not suffer end-of-life pangs of remorse, and he had no need for a dramatic death-bed conversion. When the time came for Hume to deal with death, he confronted it with equanimity and poise. When it’s my turn to come face to face with my mortality, I hope that I will meet it with something akin to David Hume’s grace.

– the chaplain

Better Than the Alternative

One of my job responsibilities is to meet, once a month, with some community members who are interested in the work my company does; they serve in an advisory capacity and also provide links between my company and community organizations. Last week, I witnessed a conversation between two church-going ladies who profess to be Christians. Denise was telling Lisa about some health problems she’d endured recently: exams, surgical procedures, medications – it was quite a sordid tale. After Denise finished her account, Lisa said, “Well, all that was better than the alternative.” Denise nodded her head and agreed, “Yes, it was certainly better than the alternative.”

I smiled, shook my head and finished eating my trifle.

The reason I smiled and shook my head is that this conversation doesn’t square up with what most Christians say they believe. Many Christians spend an inordinate amount of time trying to convince the rest of us that

Heaven is a wonderful place,
Filled with Glory and Grace;
I want to see my Savior’s face,
Heaven is a wonderful place
(I wanna go there…)

Others say,

When we all get to Heaven,
What a day of rejoicing that will be;
When we all see Jesus,
We’ll sing and shout the jubilee.

Do Christians honestly believe what they sing about, write about, preach about, and testify about? If so, why would Denise and Lisa assert that the medical procedures that prolonged Denise’s life were better than the alternative – death, heaven and Jesus? Perhaps it’s because – deep in their hearts – some (if not most) of them hope that what they believe is real, but their doubts are strong enough that they’re not ready to discover the truth, whatever it may be.

– the chaplain